|
Slide/Written Presentation Overview A proposed standard model for human history
You can also view the presentation either as a Power Point file and as a PDF file.
Unless you are somewhat familiar with Kondratievs or Long Waves, I recommend that you start with the slide deck above before reviewing the following slide deck.
 You can also view the slide deck as a PDF file if you prefer.
For those of wondering how the human domestication cycles model integrates with Ken Wilber's AQAL Integral and Don Beck's Spiral Dynamics Models, please see the following presentation. Please click on the cover image below or here to review the presentation.
 You can also view the presentation either as a Power Point file and as a PDF file. I realize there are several variations and versions of Beck's and Wilber's work floating around the web; therefore, for those who are interested how I decided on the colors and definitions I will provide a link to an overview of the Spiral Integral. You may find it at this web link. Further reading on the model as well as the supports for it is available within the book God's Evolution. The book is broadly outlined below.
God's Evolution
Instead these days I am working on in depth research of the fulcrum point for human history. That is the point when academic historians recognize human history - with the advent of human writing. I feel it is at this point where we can look and clearly see the progression in evolving human thinking relative to worldview and the development of the sciences. It is also at that moment where we can look back clearly at the catalogue archeological artifacts and use our mental capacities to see what those depictions of lethal animals, vortex symbols and pregnant Venus figurines actually were from our ancestors. Therefore I have abandoned working to prove the standard model in favor of shining the light on the fulcrum point in human history in hopes of catching the imagination of a young historian who seeks to rescue the study of human history from the tradition of study by aristocratic mental approaches and therefore one of legacy thinking resulting in soft science to one of hard science along side of all the academic subjects which are exploding in growth and understanding these days.
Why has the standard model not been proposed previously? A standard model for human history has not been proposed previously because academic historians have built a firewall between what they call prehistoric and the onset of Sumerian writing 3200bce. At the time when the scientific method was applied to all of the university level subjects, when the West began to study these academic subjects, the study was undertaken by aristocrats who had time and money to spare. They were the individuals who could afford the time to begin to build the understanding before university systems would come "online" and create a place and method for ongoing refinement and study. It was during that time when history was defined as everything that occurred after writing was clearly detectable for the early historians. Why not, they did not even know what the Egyptians, Sumerians, Akkadians and on and on had written; therefore to them what came before writing was completely indecipherable. Therefore they labeled everything before writing as before human history or Prehistoric. This firewall remains in place to this day which is why the study of human history is falling further and further behind all of the other academic subjects. The study of Biology, Chemistry, Psychology and so and so have raced out of the soft science academic classification and now even Psychology is pursued using fMRI technology in order to have concrete provable data to work with. But not the academic study of human history. Instead of looking at how the worldwide dating of images to “prehistoric” times directly interrelates to what has been decoded in almost all of the writing systems humanity utilized in ancient history they academic historians walk past this growing huge body of evidence. Instead of standard model of human history what we get is the pabulum of individuals either re-investigating or reinterpreting what is already known – perhaps sharpening that knowledge to razor fine edge as a result, or individual historians looking into what strikes their personal fancy. The result is we simply do not get Universities doggedly laying out goals to understand human history even though it is far less complex than physics as the data is right in front of us right now. In fact we do not even get any prizes or incentives for academia to even investigate the possibility that a model could even exist. All this inspite of the fact that a worldwide understanding of the telemetry in human history would broaden the entire worlds perspective of what was. Inspite of the fact that this understanding would remove history from every petty dictator or group that rewrites this non standardized model as rationalization to enslave their people or other peoples. All because academic historians refuse to take down the firewall which was erected hundreds of years ago by those who were operating under religious mode of study. That is why I am digging right at the point of accepted thinking from academicians in order to show that what they are looking was the crest of a wave. That wave itself is understandable from its previous images because the structure of waves whether in science or history is always identical. It is simply inherited cultural limitations which stand in the way of break through understanding, no longer hidden truths. Traditions can be timed in the investment of personal minutes and hours. Truth is gladly worth spending a lifetime to pursue. I happily wager the remainder of my life in pursuit of it.
Just as many people feel that quantum physics models and theories are really philosophy as well as other subjects I have cross referenced this material in a number of different ways. To aid you in navigation the following links are provided as a quick way back to the webring entrances:
|
Blog comments?Email Leo:
Reference Books for the model:
|
A book explaining our story – human history, laid upon the foundation of the economic and technological factors which have driven our domestication since the inception of our species. Every animal is driven by the requisite self interest to survive and the human family is no different than any other animal which has ever existed. A standard history model is presented for the factors which have driven our mini domestication events and then to universal momentous singular domestication events. These domestication events are the foundation for everything we know as these events are the synchronization of the state of the art survival guides for humanity. They are the update where the previous survival guides are almost entirely updated to reflect the new state of the art body of knowledge we have accumulated. I have withdrawn the book from publication even though it still shows available on Amazon and Barnes and Nobles websites. I guess it takes a long time for their systems to get updated. I withdrew the book as I am not satisfied with it as a book. Writing is a skill which I clearly do not posses and it was far too ambitious a project to record the model in a single book without factoring into consideration that it was my first book.